SwitchOn · DeepInspect
DeepInspect Cloud
A monitoring platform that gives plant teams real-time visibility into every vision system, OEE% and rejection trends — designed from scratch.
- Role
- Product Designer — sole designer
- Scope
- User research, interaction, visual design, prototyping & testing
- Timeline
- November 2022 — ongoing

Overview
- Users monitor, root-cause and improve production performance here.
- Built to monitor the performance of multiple vision systems at once.
- Tracks OEE% and analytics for each plant.
- Surfaces rejection-ratio trends and inspection images to root-cause production and machine issues.
Make it easy for end users to monitor plant performance — and to understand why it changed.
Background
I led the design of DeepInspect Cloud from scratch, simplifying genuinely complex manufacturing data into a dashboard that a plant head and an operator could both read at a glance.
The hardest part was making real-time vision-system health, OEE% and rejection trends feel trustworthy rather than overwhelming.
The process
Same Double Diamond and Lean UX process as Train, with a sharper focus on data hierarchy, multi-stakeholder readability and continuous iteration into hi-fi design and development.
The problem
Before the design team existed, users had no digital platform at all for monitoring productivity or manufacturing performance. I interviewed our primary users to understand life without a monitoring application.
- No visibility into real-time performance — no live metrics, so inefficiencies on the shop floor went undetected
- Manual data checks for OEE% — operators pulled spreadsheets and logs by hand, slowly and error-prone
- Delayed root cause analysis — diagnosing drops meant digging through fragmented data across systems and departments
- Inconsistent productivity tracking — every team used different tools and formats, so reporting was unreliable
- Reactive decision-making — problems were found late, so decisions cost time and resources
- No accountability or traceability — no audit trail to learn from past issues
What we found
- Interviews with 4 users plus competitor analysis of Elementary ML, Keyence, Cognex and DesignX
- 82% of users felt a monitoring application would make their work substantially easier
- 36% were frustrated that data mismatched when they calculated each vision system's productivity manually
The solution
- A centralised monitoring dashboard with real-time visibility per vision system and aggregated plant-level performance — no manual tracking
- An intuitive root-cause analysis flow for spotting performance drops and defect patterns across machines and lines
- Clear, visual OEE% insights so teams can compare effectiveness without spreadsheets
- A scalable information architecture that moves seamlessly from a single asset to plant-wide trends
- Filters, drill-downs and comparison tools for proactive advanced analytics
- Competitor benchmarking to fill experience gaps existing solutions ignored
- Prototypes tested across roles, from operators to plant heads
- A modular UI system that supports future scale while staying consistent
Developing it
High-fidelity mockups in Figma, specced closely with the front-end team for interactions the mockups didn't cover, and a UI/UX review of every front-end ticket before release.
Results
Factory teams gained usable, trustworthy data visibility — and feedback from users and sales highlighted how much faster their end-to-end monitoring and root-causing became.
- Complex data needs ruthless hierarchy. The value is in what you choose not to show first.
- Design for the whole ladder of users — an operator and a plant head need the same truth at different resolutions.
